Showing posts with label solar beam-down optics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solar beam-down optics. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Beamshaping is necessary

A representation of beam divergence that is wide in "longitude"

If the divergence of the sunlight reaching the lamp is too wide in "longitude," then, short of beamshaping, there is nothing a rotationally symmetric lens can do to fix it. It is therefore important to accurately model the divergence of this light.

Relations for the 180° and the general locus near the beam down optics. R is the field radius and r is the radius of the 180-degree locus. Theta is the beam angular radius. 

At a radius r = Rsinθ, the converging sunlight fills a full 180° of longitude. At a larger radius x, the sunlight fills an angle 2φ, where φ = sin-1(r/x).

For θ = 1.5°, r/R = 0.026. For R = 2600m, r = 68 m.

For φ = 10°, x/r = 5.8

For R = 2600m and x = 120m, φ = 35°; x = 190m, φ = 21°.

Since the width of the beam in the latitude dimension is not likely to be more than 4 degrees, the beam aspect ratio is 10 or greater. Thus beamshaping is necessary. 

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Concentric spherical DNG double refractive index lenses

Views from the heliostat field of three lamps that are DNG spindle hyperboloids. The oculus is colored yellow. Made in POV-Ray.

As the image above indicates, it is not sufficient to consider only the meridional rays at the beam-down optics. It is possible (e.g., the middle lamp above) to image the oculus over the entire height of the lamp, but little of its width.

(I have found that it is more common in the metamaterial literature to speak of double negative or DNG optics when the lens is not a classic Veselago flat lens. So I am switching to those terms.)

Since the lamp must be rotationally symmetric about a vertical axis, the only possible profiles in the sagittal plane are concentric circles. When light rays in the sagittal plane strike two consecutive DNG interfaces, the action is the same as a double mirror. In 2-D optics, a double mirror rotates all rays by twice the angle between the mirror lines. In this case the angle between the mirror lines is the subtense of the interior ray between where it enters the DNG material and where it exits. The direction of the bending is the same as for a circular air cavity in a "glass" medium (such is of course a diverging lens.) The narrower the spacing between the two DNG interfaces, the closer to 1.0 is the refractive index of the surrounding "glass."

Two concentric negative refractive index or DNG interfaces (composing a single-layer spherical DNG lens,) form a diverging lens.

Adding a third concentric circular surface to make a double-layer DNG spherical lens, would get us back to a converging lens at the cost of some optical loss.